About Me

Name: Roxanna M.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

A Constitutional Question

 
Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution provides as follows: 
 
All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.  (Emphasis added) 
 
I have just read that Harry Reid's idea of health care reform consists of 17 new taxes, buried in 2,000+ pages, which members are going to be given 34 hours to read.  Might as well give them longer.  They're not going to read it. 
 
Therefore, his bill - which consists of raising revenues and which originates in the Senate - is by definition unconstitutional. 
 
Don't expect to hear this from the mainstream media.  I would be surprised if even Fox picks up on it.  But don't expect for one minute that this will slow congress down. 
 
They stopped paying attention to the Constitution a long time ago, considering it an impediment instead of the instruction manual.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Could So Many Have Been So Wrong For So Long?

 
I, like millions of others, believed that the events of 9/11 were terrorist attacks and acts of war.  I have just learned that I was wrong. 
 
On May 21, 2009, Obama gave a speach wherein he stated that America will "try those who have violated American criminal laws in federal courts", while those "who violate the laws of war" will be tried in military commissions. 
 
Therefore, neither Khalid Sheikh Mohammad nor Osama bin Laden committed a terrorist attack or an act of war.  They simply committed crimes.  Heck, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D) says there's no need to even interrogate Osama.  Of course there's not.  Why on earth would we ever want to learn more about what our enemy has in store for us. 
 
Sen. Richard Durbin (D) thinks "it's a dream come true" for the detainees at Gitmo to come live in Illinois.  It's no longer an act of war to deliberately target civilians.  So, come on out of your cave, Osama.  Turn yourself in.  Join your friends in the heartland of America.  Come live Mr. Durbin's dream.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Don't You Just Love It!

  

 
While giving Oprah her biggest audience in two years, Sarah Palin had this to say in response to Oprah's question regarding whether or not she felt snubbed when Oprah did not invite her to appear on her show during the 2008 campaign: 
 
"No offense to you, but it wasn't the center of my universe".
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Do Not Believe Him

 
In an interview with Jim Lehrer, Eric Holder said that he did not consult with Obama before he made the decision to bring KSM to New York for trial. 

He talked it over with prosecutors at both the Justice and Defense Departments, "people on staff" at both the Justice and Defense Departments, and with "a whole variety of people, who shared ideas, thoughts, gave cautionary ideas as well".  He also talked it over with his wife and his brother. 

I'm supposed to believe that he not only had the authority to make such a momentous decision by himself, but that he never once discussed it with the President of the United States. 

I don't think so.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Coming Soon to Flagpoles Everywhere?

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Check It Out

 
John Yoo, who was with the Justice Department during the Bush administration, and who is a target of the left, has an article today at 
 
 
wherein he states what I have stated previously:  that a civilian criminal trial of KSM will be good for al qaeda and bad for America. 
 
Pay careful attention to what he has to say in the last two paragraphs. 
 
I repeat.  Barack Obama is deliberately setting the stage for the release of KSM so he can blame it on Bush so he can change the current trajectory of events.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Way of Looking At It

 
My husband voiced a disturbing thought yesterday.  What if the whole purpose of bringing KSM to New York for trial is to insure that he gets released. What if some federal judge - out to make a name for himself, write a book, get on all the Sunday talk shows, serve as a paid consultant on CNN - orders all charges dropped and KSM released because he was waterboarded under the previous administration. 
 
Check out this video from 2006.
  
 
The PR value of such a move cannot be overstated.  The in-Obama's-back-pocket media would go wild.  Dimocrats in congress would not be able to contain themselves.  There would be absolute nonstop vilification of George W. Bush.   Somebody, somewhere would call for his arrest and trial. 
 
Lost in all of the hoopla would be the simple fact that KSM is the admitted mastermind of 9/11, who gave up truckloads of information that saved lives.  That despite this, a carefully calculcated decision was made to insure his freedom. 
 
Considering the current occupant of the White House, is this really so far-fetched?  Obama is hemorrhaging support on all sides.  His poll ratings are down.  Unemployment is up.  Pessimism is up.  Conservatives outnumber liberals 2-1.  Independents are going right in droves.  Two formerly democrat governorships went Republican.  Republicans are ahead on nearly every issue and on generic ballots. 
 
Obama must do something to turn that tide, and if letting KSM go free so that he can blame Bush and change the topic of discussion, he'll do it.  Without batting an eye.  Without a single second's hesitation.  If a good and decent man - who kept us safe for 7 years - must be trashed so that Obama can save his backside, then so be it.
 
Of course, such a strategy is dependent on the belief that there are enough Americans out there who'll buy this.  Enough Americans who aren't smart enough to know that Obama made the decision to try KSM in a civilian court, even though military tribunals were established for just this purpose.  Enough Americans who aren't smart enough to know that the judge who ordered the release was looking for fame and fortune,  Enough Americans who don't listen to Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly. 
 
If such a thing happens and regardless of what they say publicly, even the Left is going to be more than a little worried that it did.  Even those who make a tidy living off bashing America want to be safe.  They still want to live in a country where they're free to run off at the mouth and not get arrested.  Regardless of what they say, you'll notice they're still here. 
 
If such a thing happens, the immediate advantage will be Obama's.  But nobody likes to be betrayed, and the long term consequences will also be Obama's. 
 
And our's.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Neverending Farce

 
In a decision that reeks of political correctness, the Powers That Be in this country have declared that the mastermind, and four other planners, of the attacks of 9/11 will be tried in civilian court in - of all places - the very city where they murdered 3,000 people.  Attorney General Holder expressed confidence that these men will be convicted, but he has yet to bring any formal charges.  So, we don't even know what these men are going to be charged with.
 
This irrational decision proves once and for all, irrevocably, that the people in charge of this nation are completely and utterly unqualified for the positions they hold, as they do not have the national security interests of America in mind.  Somewhere, our Founding Fathers are turning over in their graves at what has happened to the country they risked all to establish. 
 
Don't ever forget that we the taxpayers are going to be paying for all of this.  So, let's start ticking off the dollars. 
 
Where are these individuals going to be housed both while they are awaiting trial and during trial?  How much extra security will be needed?  They are all going to get at least one attorney, probably two or three, plus all necessary investigative personnel, all of whose fees will be paid by us.  I doubt there will be any oversight in this regard, so the sky will probably be the limit.  They will have to be suitably clad for court, which means we'll have to pay for their wardrobes. 
 
Before there is even a trial, there has to be discovery, which means that the attorneys are going to demand everything the government has, which means there will be motions and hearings and rulings about what these attorneys can and can't have, and there will probably be interim appeals in this regard.  The billable hours will fly by like the odometer in a car.  I would hope that somebody, somewhere is going to be interested in our national security, but there's certainly no guarantee of that. I guess we should be thankful that this case is in New York and not California, where the Ninth would have a shot at it.
 
This spectacle is going to be played out on the international stage, and everybody, and I do mean everybody, is going to be looking out for Number One, seeking all the media attention he or she can get.   How long the pre-trial process will drag on is anyone's guess, but I'm sure we're going to be plenty sick of seeing these people long before the trial begins. 
 
Keep in mind that these criminal defendants - who want to destroy our country and our government - are going to get every single right that we get, including a trial by a jury of their peers, which begs the question:  what constitutes a jury of their peers?  I, for one, would find it hugely insulting to be considered a peer of these individuals.
 
This brings up another question.  Are they all going to be tried in one trial, or will each get a separate trial?  If the latter, then 60 people are going to have to be found - in the city where the murders occurred - that can be fair and impartial.  Jury selection alone can go on forever because, let's face it, there is never going to be found enough competent people who have not heard of 9/11, have not formulated an opinion about it, and who can honestly say they could be fair and impartial. 
 
And, if by some miracle some jurors can be found, they will have targets on their backs.  How much is it going to cost us for their security, as well as the security of their families?  Will they be sequestered?  How much will that cost us?  How much for the security of the judge(s) and courtroom personnel?  How much for the attorneys and their families? 
 
Ka-ching.  Ka-ching.  Ka-ching.
 
These people are entitled to know what evidence will be used against them.  What if the national security interests of this country require that certain evidence not be given to these people and their lawyers?  What if the charges must be dismissed because of this?  What if less serious charges must be brought?  What if these individuals walk? 
 
If these individuals walk, or are convicted of lesser offenses, the terrorists of the world laugh at us.  Heck, they're already laughing at us.  Even if these individuals are convicted of something, the argument will be:  what would you expect from the residents of the city where the attacks occurred.  This is a no-win situation for America and a win-win for terrorists.
 
This is sheer madness. 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Rose By Any Other Name

 
A muslim man who attended the same mosque as some of the 9/11 hijackers.  Who was known to have attempted to contact al-qaeda.  Who was known for his radical, anti-American rantings.  Who entered a building, allegedly shouted allahu akhbar, and opened fire on Americans.
 
The White House is not using the word terrorism.  The Army, which takes its orders from the White House, is not using the word terrorism.  The left-leaning media, which sacrificed what was left of its neutrality and objectivity to get Obama elected, is not using the word terrorism.  Nobody dares call this what it is because to do so would be to remind people that George W. Bush kept this country safe for 7 years.
 
Obama couldn't make it 10 months. 
 
At a time when Obama's approval rating is on the way down and his disapproval rating is on the way up.  At a time of record unemployment and sky-high budget deficits.  At a time of rampant pessimism among the American people.  At a time when self-identified conservatives outnumber self-identified liberals 2-1.  At a time when democrats are self-destructing on the altar of Obama's agenda, and the pendulum is already swinging back to Republicans, bringing independents in droves.  
 
Amidst all of this, comes the first terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11. 
 
Even though Obama remains personally popular, albeit far less so than last year at this time, professionally, he is losing traction.  Therefore, there must be no mention whatsoever of the 'T' word, and the left will spin itself dizzy to prevent this thought - Obama could not keep us safe for 10 months - from taking hold of the American public.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Class: Either You Got It Or You Ain't

 
This is what the first missus thought was appropriate attire to wear to Veterans' Day services at Arlington:
 
 
 
 
Of course, there is another way to look at this.  Obama had just met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Israel took out Iraq's nuclear facilities way back when, and just might be contemplating doing the same thing to Iran's. 
 
Blue is the color of mourning in Iran.  Is Michelle sending a message?
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is It Hot in Here?

 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Much More Proof Do You Need?

 
Barack Obama famously bowed to the unelected ruler of Saudi Arabia.  He kissed Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.  He said nothing when the president of Nicaragua spent nearly an hour blasting America.  When despots of Iran began butchering people who dared to protest against the phony elections that had just been held, Obama said he wasn't going to meddle. 
 
But, when the elected president of Honduras took a page from Hugo's playbook and began taking steps to make himself ruler for life, Obama was simply aghast that the citizens of Honduras, in accordance with the laws of their country, took steps to stop him.  Obama is still appalled that the Hondurans refused to submit to this attempted coup and is using the full resources of this country to make sure that the wannabe dictator is returned to power. 
 
There are celebrations in Germany marking the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall.  While other world leaders are there, Obama is not.  The man famous for partying can't find the time to attend a party celebrating freedom.
 
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in DC.  What is Obama's position?  Israel had better come to the peace table with more concessions.  He has made no such requests of Palestine.
 
A muslim opens fire at Ft Hood, murdering 13 soldiers and wounding 29 others, yet there is no outrage from the Commander in Chief.  Not only is there no outrage, there's no anything.  Obama is acting as though this is a non-event that doesn't even require his attention.  
 
Obama can party every week.  Fly to Chicago and New York City for date nights.  Throw out the opening pitch at the World Series.  Yet, he can't seem to find the time to talk to his commander in Afghanistan, nor respond to his request for more troops.  Winning a war in the country that was the launching pad of the 9/11 attacks isn't important.
 
Time and time again, we see the President of the United States, Leader of the Free World, amply demonstrate support for dictators and antipathy to freedom. 
 
Doesn't bode well for his plans for America.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Shackles of Government Health Care

 
The truly disgusting thing yesterday wasn't watching congress take the first step towards reinstituting slavery in America.  The truly disgusting thing was to watch dimocrat congressmen - those who had not written the bill, had not read the bill, and who had taken steps to protect themselves from the bill - stand there and proclaim how wonderful it is going to be. Never in history have we been lied to so blatantly.  Never in history have our elected officials demonstrated quite so clearly that they are completely and utterly without worth.
 
I am not one of those who extols health care in America.  I have watched friends die because of medical malpractice.  I speak out long and loud about the butchers in white coats who kill some 3,000+ people a week and then gripe about the high cost of malpractice insurance.  
 
But yesterday, dimocrat morons took the first step toward making a bad system worse.  Government will determine what procedures doctors can do and what they will get paid.  Insurers will be shielded from the consequences of their decisions.  No MRI for you.  Brain tumor?  Death?  Shielded.  Why bother doing the right thing when there's no consequence for doing the wrong thing, especially when doing the wrong thing saves money.
 
Why bother going to medical school - incurring huge debt - when you're never going to be able to pay it back.  Ability is out, diversity is in.  We're not going to have the best health care providers, we're going to have the right "color" mix. 
 
For the first time in the history of this once great nation, Americans can go to prison if they don't buy what the government tells them they have to buy.  Let that sink in a minute.  The truly insidious thing about this is that there's no way out.  Electric bill too high?  Cut back.  Grocery bill too high?  Cut back.  Gasoline bill too high?  Cut back.  Health insurance too high?  Too bad.  There is absolutely nothing you will be able to do about it and still live in America. 
 
The government cannot do anything right.  Once the State has its claws in health care, there's nowhere to go but down.  Health care will get worse and worse, and the costs will go up and up.  And you will pay that price or you will go to prison. 
 
Generations of Americans have fought and died for freedom.  All of their deaths have been in vain because we are no longer free.  We're slaves on the plantation formerly known as America. 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So, This Is What We've Come To

 
According to the report released by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) on November 2, the health care "reform" bill that Nancy Pelosi is so desperately trying to pass provides that:
 
(1)  a person earning $44,000 - before taxes - will have to pay a $5,300 premium AND still be responsible for another $2,000 out-of-pocket.   

(2)  a family earning $102,100 - before taxes - will have to pay a $15,000 premium AND still be responsible for another $5,300 out-of-pocket. 

To help pay for this new plan, about $500 billion is going to be taken from Medicare, which is going broke.  So, basically, the idiots in charge of this country are going to rob Peter to pay Paul, even though Peter is broke.

We must enroll in a "qualified plan" now, even though it won't be until 18 months after the bill is signed into law that the Secretary of Health and Human Services - most likely exempt from this horror - will decide what constitutes a "qualified plan".  Better not need a doctor for a year and a half because nobody will know what's covered and what isn't.

When you file your taxes, you must provide proof that you are covered by a "qualified" plan or you will be fined.  Unless, of course, you're an illegal alien, in which case nothing really changes.  You'll still get free health care courtesy of the citizens of this country, until such time as we're all broke.

Reimbursement to health care providers will be based on what it costs in the lowest cost regions of the country.  So, Dr. So-and-So in San Francisco is going to receive the same amount as Dr. So-and-So in Podunk.  We will have to settle for a nurse practitioner instead of a doctor for primary care.  And hospice patients get no doctors at all, just physician assistants. 

Billions of dollars are going to be directed to:
 
(1)  "community entities" that have "documented community activity and experience with community healthcare workers" to "educate, guide, and provide experiential learning opportunities" so that "each community health worker program receiving funds under the grant will provide services in the cultural context most appropriate for the individual served by the program"; 

(2)  grants that establish racial and ethnic preferences for training nurses and creating secondary-school health science programs, i.e., grants for nursing schools should "give preference to programs that provide for improving the diversity of new nurse graduates to reflect changes in the demographics of the patient population" and secondary-school grants should go to schools "graduating students from disadvantaged backgrounds, including racial and ethnic minorities".  In other words, ability and skill are no longer required.  You just have to be the right color.

Also tucked away in this so-called health care "reform" bill is the provision that if you don't buy insurance, you go to prison.  And, there's also a hefty fine of $250,000. 

So, this is government of the people, by the people, for the people. 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789105152Next »