About Me

Name:Roxanna M.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

This Is America . . .

 
We don't need no stinking truth!
 
Barack Obama consistently gets an overwhelming majority of the black vote.  This is the truth, but if we say it, we're "racist".
 
Some people are not going to vote for Obama because he's black.  This is the truth, but if we say it, we're "racist".
 
Some of the comments made by Jeremiah Wright are despicable, as is the fact that he made them from the pulpit of a church.  This is the truth, but if we say it, we're "racist".
 
We have every right to question Obama's ties to this man, but if we do so, we're "racist".
 
Obama recently sacked an advisor who, in his spare time, held meetings with Hamas, which might explain why Ahmed Yousef, the leader of Hamas, endorsed Obama.  But, when John McCain truthfully pointed this out, Obama said:  "This is offensive, and I think it's disappointing.  Because John McCain always says 'I am not going to run that kind of politics,' and to engage in that kind of smear is unfortunate, particularly because my policy toward Hamas has been no different than his.  I've said it's a terrorist organization and we should not negotiate with them unless they recognize Israel, renounce violence, and unless they are willing to abide by previous accords between the Palestinians and the Israelis.  So for him to toss out comments like that I think is an example of him losing his bearings as he pursues this nomination.  We don't need name calling in this debate."
 
McCain told the truth.  He didn't smear Obama, and it was Obama who resorted to name calling.  How "racist" of me to point this out. 
 
The list goes one.  If we vote against Hillary because she's a woman, we're "sexist".  If we vote against McCain because he's old, we're "ageist". 
 
But, if we vote for them, we're "racist".
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Quote of the Week

 
"It's not math anymore, it's psychodrama.  If she can't have it, no one can have it.  If she has to tear the party apart, she will."
 
Peggy Noonan
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Happened?

 
"In a relatively short amount of time, Clinton has gone from being the inevitable winner to being the underdog to being a dead woman walking."
 
Roger Simon (Politico.com)
 
It wasn't all that long ago that Dick Morris, a man who, arguably, knows the Clintons better than anybody, wrote a book saying that Hillary Clinton was going to be the candidate and the Republican's only hope of victory was Condoleezza Rice.
 
I never understood the "inevitable" talk.  I realize that she thought she was inevitable because that's all she heard in the echo chamber of her mind.  But, how did that concept get passed on to the public?  What made other people say the same thing?  Some kind of collective brainwashing, i.e., say something long enough and loud enough and everybody will start to believe it?
 
Look how far we've come in a year.
 
And that, I think, is the problem.  The more America saw her, the less they liked her.  Let's face it, the Clintons, whether jointly or individually, have been in our face for some 16 years now, and this interminable campaign makes both of them seem omnipresent.  Maybe we're sick of them. 
 
Or, maybe her "mistake" regarding Bosnia reminded people that the dark, underlying current of the Clinton administration was dishonesty.  Maybe she reminds us of the successive investigations, the vanishing and reappearing records, and the myriad variations on "I don't remember", "I don't recall", etc., etc., etc.  Maybe we don't want to go back to a time when "is" turned out to mean something entirely different than what we thought it meant. 
 
Maybe she reminds us that, despite their millions in book advances, they removed items from the White House and registered like newlyweds so that other people could furnish their million-dollar homes.  Maybe we think her determination to stay in the race is more desperation than pluck.
 
Whatever the reason, she appears to have worn out her welcome.  Wouldn't want to be the person who has to break it to her.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pathetic Specimen of the Breed

 
I still remember the presidential election of 2000.  I remember watching the election results.  I remember the liberal media calling Florida for Gore even though the televised vote count showed Bush ahead.  I remember all that happened after that, the back and forth in to the wee hours.  I remember going to bed believing that Bush had won and waking up to hear that Florida was, once again, in play.  I remember the recounts and lawsuits. 
 
Most of all I remember thinking "what a pathetic specimen of the breed", as Al Gore desperately clung to his presidential ambitions, refusing to acknowledge that he had lost.
 
I am reminded of those feelings today.  According to the news this morning, the misery toll from Cyclone Nargis is:  22,000 dead, 41,000 missing, and 1 million homeless.  The death toll is expected to rise and possibly exceed 100,000.
 
And what does Mr. Hot Air have to say?  Global warming was responsible. 
 
More and more scientists are coming around to the fact that the global warming "crisis" is nothing more than a hoax.  It has been confirmed that the temperature of the planet has not risen in a decade.  It has been confirmed that there is less solar activity.  NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has confirmed that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation's cool phase shift could bring colder temperatures for the next 20-30 years.  A German study has predicted cooler ocean temperatures because of the Meridional Overturning Circulation entering a weak cycle.
 
Like the greedy, grasping Clintons, Al Gore has decided that having millions of dollars is not enough.  He wants millions and millions and millions more besides and that won't happen unless the global warming/climate change myth is maintained.  
 
It speaks volumes about this man that his first thought in the wake of this tragedy was nothing more than self-promotion in the pursuit of money.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

That's Rich!

 
In favor of a federal gas-tax "holiday", Hillary Clinton said today that oil companies "have record profits that they frankly are just sitting there counting because they are not doing anything new to earn it; they are just taking advantage of what's going on.  We ought to say, 'Wait a minute, we'd rather have the oil companies pay the gax tax than the drivers of North Carolina, especially truck drivers, or the farmers, or other people who have to commute long distances."
 
Where to begin.
 
Firstly, she isn't one to talk about "excess profits".  She and her husband have received over $100 million in the past seven years or so and every single one of those dollars was an excess profit.
 
Secondly, is she really so stupid to think that the oil companies would pay the federal taxes without passing that cost on to us?  Or, does she think we're too stupid to know that?
 
Thirdly, what on earth is the federal government doing to "earn" the 18.4-cents-per-gallon gas tax and the 24.4-cents-per-gallon diesel tax that it is getting?  Talk about "not doing anything to earn it."  Talk about "just taking advantage of what's going on."
 
A gas-tax holiday should be just that.  We don't pay the tax.  Oil companies don't pay the tax.  The federal behemoth that brought us this disaster should just eat it.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A World Gone Mad

 
Unbelievable!  The Weekly Standard reports that The Swiss Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology has decided that plants have "dignity" and that the arbitrary killing of flora is "morally wrong."  I guess this naturally follows the provision the Swiss inserted into their constitution requiring "account to be taken of the dignity of creation when handling animals, plants and other organisms."
 
Part of the poppycock emanating from this panel provides that "living organisms should be considered morally for their own sake because they are alive," that humans cannot claim "absolute ownership" over plants, and that "individual plants have an inherent worth," which means that people "may not use them just as we please, even if the plant community is not in danger, or if our actions do not endanger the species, or if we are not acting arbitrarily."
 
In other words, "killing" plants for food is okay, but don't you dare mow your lawn?
 
My gosh!  Has the world really come to this?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are You Kidding Me?

 
The World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY) (whammy!?!) has denounced the film "Fitna" by Geert Wilders of the Netherlands.  Fitna is Arabic for strife.
 
Claiming that it is an "anti-koran" film, the secretary-general of WAMY said:  "These kinds of attacks by so-called sane European politicians and scholars will lead to very serious repercussions, pushing mankind to a situation of chaos and conflict."  WAMY called the film "a new obstacle to block any sensible dialogue between religions" and said "It is high time that the West moves quickly to control the damage.  They don't understand how much Muslims love and respect their Prophet.  If we do something against Christianity or target Christian interests in retaliation, the Netherlands, Europe and the whole world would object.  But Islam does not teach that, it advocates peace and co-existence.  I'm afraid that the Western world has failed to understand the severity of the problem."
 
In what alternative universe does this idiot live?
 
On September 11, 2001, nineteen losers hijacked four planes and slaughtered nearly 3,000 people. 
 
We understand that it isn't us "pushing mankind to a situation of chaos and conflict."  We understand that it isn't us who is an "obstacle" to "sensible dialogue between religions."  We understand that islam does not advocate "peace and co-existence."  We understand that we have no obligation to move "quickly to control the damage." 
 
In short, we understand the "severity of the problem."  We also understand that it's impossible to have a dialogue with people who won't accept that they are the problem. 

A lot like dealing with liberals, isn't it?
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Of Course It Won't

 
I read today that the Clinton Library will not make available to the public the documents that Sandy Berger illegally took from the National Archives in 2003.  Of course it won't.
 
According to a letter from the library, these documents are "restricted in their entirety" and are "classified in the interest of national defense or foreign policy" and contain "confidential communications requesting or submitting advice between the president and his advisors, or between such advisors."
 
If Bill Clinton had wanted these documents made available to the public, he wouldn't have had Sandy Burglar steal them in the first place.  These documents must remain secret because neither of the Clintons want anybody to know that the Clinton administration, which Hillary has adopted as her own, dropped the ball on terrorism and is directly responsible for the events of 9/11.
 
So, what we have here, is Hillary Clinton out having a field day with Obama's relationship with Jeremiah Wright while she ignores her own with a man who has said and done things far worse than Mr. Wright could ever imagine. 

And, she's getting away with it.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Quote of the Week

 
"It may surprise Americans to discover that the United States is the third-largest oil producer, behind Saudi Arabia and Russia.  We could be producing more, but Congress has put large areas of potential supply off-limits.  These include the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and parts of Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.  By government estimates, these areas may contain 25-30 billion barrels of oil (against about 30 billion of proven U.S. reserves today) and 80 trillion cubic feet or more of natural gas (compared with about 200 tcf of proven reserves).
 
What keeps these areas closed are exaggerated enrivonmental fears, strong prejudice against oil companies and sheer stupidity."
 
Robert Samuelson, Newsweek and Washington Post Contributing Editor
 
Calling the actions of Congress "sheer stupidity" is giving them way too much credit.  Keeping us dependent on a spigot that can be turned off at any time has endangered our economy, our way of life, and our national security.  Congress' action, or inaction to put it more correctly, is nothing less than criminal.  And don't think for one second that this body of fools doesn't grasp this concept.  No, rather than admit they were wrong and accept responsibility for their behavior, which might cause some people to actually think about whether or not to re-elect them, they have decided to loudly and continually blame Bush/Cheney/Big Oil.  Most importantly, they're banking on the fact that we're stupid enough to buy what they're peddling. 
 
Since America appears poised to put the last remaining branch of government - democrats already have Congress and the Judiciary - back into democrat hands, they just might be right. 
 
Friends don't let friends vote for democrats.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Denounce Me?

 
 
The right Reverend Wright's on a bender,
and his message for O less than tender.
"Denounce me" he says,
"let me show you the ways
I can put your campaign through the blender."
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Baby Steps to Health Care Reform

 
The health care industry cannot be fixed in one fell swoop, nor should it.  We need to keep what works and get rid of what doesn't.  Here, in my humble opinion, are the first steps we need to take.
 
1.  Health insurance should be for catastrophic care only.  For far too long now the myth has been peddled that we can have all the health care we want for a $10 co-pay.  Such stupidity has led to the high costs we're now experiencing.  What's the old adage:  If you want more of something, subsidize it, which is exactly what we have done.  The doctor visit is $100.00 (for demonstration purposes only), but you only pay $10.00.  Therefore, insurance has subsidized the other $90.00.  How much would your car insurance cost if you used it every time you bought new tires or had a tune-up?  Health insurance should be no different.  It makes no economic sense to pay $500.00 a month for insurance just to get a $10.00 visit.  Of course, the common sense economics of this is lost on politicians.  Indeed, it's lost on a lot of people.
 
People first started abusing the system when they thought they were getting something for nothing.  They got free health insurance from their employment and only had to pay $10.00 to see the doctor.  Such a deal!  Remember, we don't appreciate what we don't pay for.  Then, after insurance kept getting more and more expensive, the thought was, "well I'm paying for it, I might as well use it."  You see the vicious cycle. 

This would also stop the abuse of those who run to the doctor every time their nose runs, or those who think of doctor visits as a social event.
 
2.  Too radical for you?  Then get rid of government mandates.  Legislatures just keep mandating more and more coverage, which does nothing but add to the bill.  If I want chiropractic coverage, then let me pay for it.  Same goes for everything else.  If all I want is catastrophic care, I should be allowed that choice.  Unfortunately, the California Legislature - which has been in the back pocket of the insurance industry for decades - denies me that choice.
 
3.  Separate health care from employment.  This has been another factor in increased costs.  Insurance companies just keep raising the premiums, taunting businesses with "what are you going to do about it."  This made sense when people worked all their lives for one company.  In this day and age of mobility, however, it is an antiquated concept. 
 
4.  Make health care providers pay for their own mistakes.  The current system allows doctors to make you sicker and then bill your health insurance for the privilege.  That needs to come to a screeching halt right now.  You get an infection that could have been prevented, the health care provider has to pick up the tab.  A doctor removes the wrong kidney, then he picks up your health care for that condition for the rest of your life.  You get the idea.  This idea has merit on two fronts:  (1) insurance won't be picking up the tab; and (2) doctors just might start being more careful.  I know, the argument against this will be that hospitals and doctors will have to increase their charges to cover their own negligence.  Exactly how would that be different from what they're doing now?
 
5.  Open up the market.  Let insurance companies peddle their wares in all states.
 
6.  Grasp the concept that America already has socialized medicine, it's just being run by the insurance industry.  A health care provider can charge whatever he wants, it's the insurance company that decides how much to pay him.  A health care provider wants to schedule a test, it's the insurance company that gives the green or red light.  We have given far too much power and wealth to the insurance industry, and they should start being nicer to us, 'cause if they don't, government is going to grab everything and they'll be broke.
 
7. Grasp the concept that We the People have power.  Get off your lazy butts and start contacting your elected officials.  Make them actually do something to earn their salaries, their perks, and their exalted opinions of themselves.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

There's No Money In Good Health

 
A friend of mine passed away last week.  She died from the cancer her doctor told her she didn't have.  She bought into the myth that regular trips to the doctor will keep you healthy.
 
Like a good little girl, she went for her yearly mammogram.  And every year, the doctor told her she was fine when, in fact, the cancer was growing.  When the doctor finally "saw" it, he assured her that it was small.  She was relieved and thrilled.  Such feelings were short-lived however when further tests showed that the "small" cancer in her breast was now in her lungs, requiring surgery and chemotherapy.  And now, she's dead.
 
We have the greatest health care system in the world, or so we're told.  So, why didn't the doctor see the cancer before it had metastasized?  Isn't that the purpose of a yearly mammogram?   What's the purpose of going if doctors don't know what they're looking at or looking for?  My husband represented the widower of a woman whose doctor didn't see her breast cancer until it was stage IV metastatic.  The irony was that the doctor died before the woman did. 
 
A recent episode of "Grey's Anatomy" showed the Izzie character running $120,000 worth of unnecessary tests because she wanted to "find" something and win some contest.  Don't laugh.  Doctors run unnecessary tests all the time because they make money doing so.  Of course, their high-minded excuse is that they need to do so to (1) prevent malpractice claims and (2) keep you healthy.  Don't you believe it.  Infections are the easiest thing to prevent, yet the easiest thing to get.  Why prevent an infection when you can make more money for treating one?  Why find cancer when it's small when you can make more money for treating it when it's bigger? 

No one tells us that doctors are the third leading cause of death in America, behind cancer and heart disease. Doctors will kill more people in one month than the Iraq war has killed in 5 years, and we're vilified if we want to sue one who has caused us harm. 
 
There's no money in good health, and doctors have no interest whatsoever in keeping you that way.  Their only interest is in keeping you coming to see them.  They prey on our fear of death, and their greed and fraud is a major contributing factor to the high price of health care.  Ironic, isn't it, that as the cost goes up, the quality goes down. 

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is There No Such Thing As Shame Anymore?

 
In her Earth Day address, Nancy Pelosi said:  "The Bible tells us in the Old Testament, 'To minister to the needs of God's creation is an act of worship.  To ignore those needs is to dishonor God who made us.'  On this Earth Day, and every day, let us honor the earth and our future generations with a commitment to fight climate change."
 
Small problem.  The Old Testament, apparently, says no such thing.  Biblical scholars have been unable to find such a verse.  I asked my dad, my very own go to Biblical scholar, and he could find nothing either.  There's just something inherently wrong with misquoting the Bible, especially if it's in the name of the greatest hoax in history. 
 
Tell me, how do we honor God when we starve the less fortunate among us because we're growing corn to put in our gas tanks?  Elitism doesn't come any bigger than that. 
 
And, of course, liberals are leading the way. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just As Predicted . . .

 
. . . and right on schedule.
 
The Congressional CYA over high and rising oil prices has begun.  And, just as predicted, dimocrats are blaming it on Bush.  I'm shocked.
 
According to the Fox News Ticker this morning, dimocrat lawmakers are threatening to stall multi-million dollar arm sales to Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other OPEC nations unless Bush starts using "leverage" to press for more oil.  Dims say that Bush is not doing enough.
 
Beg some more, Mr. President, even though we're the ones who won't allow drilling in ANWR or anywhere else there's oil in America.  Beg some more, Mr. President, even though it's all our fault for being too stupid to see beyond the end of our noses.  Beg some more, Mr. President, because rising gas costs might cost us our jobs and we have no ability whatsoever to do anything other than feed at the public trough.  It's not like we have any usable job skills.  Beg some more, Mr. President, because somebody has got to fix what we broke and, quite frankly, we're far too incompetent.  Like the children we are, we can only get into messes.  We expect adults to get us out of them.
 
Beg some more, Mr. President, beg some more.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Declaration of Independence

 
   When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. 
 
   We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.  That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.  That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.  Prudence, indeed will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.  But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
 
   America is rapidly reaching the point our Founding Fathers did when this document was written, due solely to a government that has shown remarkable indifference to this nation and its people for decades now.  Gas is at $4.00 a gallon and rising daily.  Had our government had the foresight of a flea, we would have begun drilling in ANWR a decade or more ago and that precious fuel would most likely now be available for our use. 
 
   But no.  The arrogant, ignorant, shortsightedness of America's elite led them to believe that they could keep OPEC countries in line indefinitely.  No need to develop our own resources, no need to develop alternative sources of energy, OPEC would continue to supply us with the lifeblood of the world for as long as we needed, as economically as we needed.  If ignorance is bliss, these elites were ecstatic.
 
   And while America slept, its false sense of security intact, these nations tested their wings.  And they learned they were the ones with the power.  Too late America realized the stranglehold it is in.  What if these countries started charging $1,000 a barrel for oil?  Since we have nothing to fall back on, what exactly can we do about it?  Our government has left us defenseless and at the mercy of people who are even now salivating at the prospect that our downfall might be just around the corner. 
 
   And, their stupidity doesn't end there.  In an effort to "fix" the global warming/climate change "crisis" - a hoax that has become a living, breathing monster, devouring every ounce of common sense in its path - our government has demanded the growing of fuel for our vehicles.  This remarkably stupid action has resulted in the doubling and tripling of food prices around the world.  Food riots around the world.  Haiti's government toppled.  Shoppers in California being asked to voluntarily limit the amount of rice they buy.  Trying to "fix" global warming/climate change is starving people now, the very thing they thought they could avoid by playing God.  Worse yet, there appears to be no sign that our government grasps its stupidity.  Even with all that's happening, it still plans to put its global warming/climate change plans into action.

   What's going to happen in America when voluntary rationing becomes mandatory rationing?  What's going to happen in America when gas is $5, $6, or more a gallon?  What's going to happen in America when first the little business are forced to close, followed by the big businesses, and everyone, not just the little people, have to start doing without?  

   If we aren't already in crisis, we're pretty dang close.  And, as we all know, our government is not good at handling crises, so hard to get anything done when you're busy pointing fingers.  But, if I was this government, I would remove my head from where it has been so firmly lodged for so very long now and start thinking up real solutions to the very real problems facing us.  

   I don't really care that their sole impetus is getting re-elected, as long as it gets their fat fannies in gear.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123456789102122Next »