About Me

Name:Roxanna M.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Loser of the Week

 
Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND) for calling up the CEO of Countrywide asking for a mortgage and then saying that he was unaware he had received preferential treatment. 

". . . it appears Countrywide waived one point on my mortgage.  Although I did not ask for or know that I was receiving a discount, and even though I was offered a competitive loan from another lender, I do not want to have received preferential treatment.  Therefore, I am writing a check today to Habitat for Humanity for $10,500.00." 

He's kidding, right.  What on earth did he think was going to happen when he bypassed the normal procedure to call the CEO directly and say, "I'm Kent Conrad, Senator Kent Conrad, and I want a loan."  Does he call Bill Gates directly when he wants to buy Microsoft products? 

The story doesn't end there.  It seems that Countrywide also provided a loan on Mr. Conrad's 8-unit apartment building in North Dakota, when it typically only makes loans on properties with 4 units or less.  No worries, though.  Mr. Conrad is going to seek refinancing on that property from another lender.  Why not, whatever increase there might be will just be passed along to the tenants. 

"I never expect to be treated better than anyone else because I am a U.S. senator.   That is not in my nature.  That is not who I am.

Oh, please !

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Water Seeks Its Own Level

 
Apparently, one or more 527s, as they're called, have put together some commercials for BO that have hit YouTube.
 
The first deals with a woman and her baby son, Alex.  She tells John McCain that he can't have him.  Well, no kidding.  What would President McCain, or President BO for that matter, want with a baby.  By the time Baby Alex is ready to either decide for himself that he wants to serve his country or is draft-age, depending on the state of the country, neither McCain nor BO will be in the White House.  So, no point whatsoever is being made by this commercial.
 
The second is about a guy and a girl hook up at a bar and go back to his place.  She changes her mind when she thinks he's a Republican and can't get out of there fast enough.  The moral of the story:  it's okay to have sex with someone you've just met, unless he/she is a Republican, because that would be immoral. 
 
Fast forward to the candidate for whom these commercials were made.  It was only recently that BO said that there was nothing wrong with the high price of gas because it would make people change their driving habits.  Apparently, the Man Who Would Be King is unaware of the fact that the high price of gas will do more than make people change their driving habits.  Apparently, he is unaware of the fact that the high price of gas will affect the price of goods in the marketplace.  Apparently, he is unaware of the fact that paying more for gas means people will have less money to pay for those goods in the marketplace, which means that a lot of the goods won't get bought.  The businesses will lose money and people will be out of jobs.  Eventually, businesses will close and more people will be out of jobs.  The stock market will drop.  Apparently, BO can't or won't see that the high price of gas affects more than just people's driving habits.  And, apparently, he doesn't have an advisor smart enough to educate him in this regard. 
 
I remember once reading a comment from a man who didn't want "war for oil".  It seems that he didn't care about the high price of gas, because he could just take the bus.  You know, the ones that run on good intentions.  He, like Obama, couldn't see beyond the immediate "me" to the bigger picture.
 
What is the common thread that binds these four examples together?  A failure to see the bigger picture?  A failure to see how absolutely ridiculous they look?  Absolutely.  And why?  Immaturity.  Astonishing, astounding, overwhelming immaturity. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just A Thought

 
I read where al qaeda is having trouble recruiting suicide bombers.
 
Maybe the should offer a better benefits package.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Deer in the Headlights

 
We've all heard it:  We can't drill our way out of this.  It's the neverending, oft-repeated mantra of the incompetent dimwits who are largely responsible for the muddle we're in. 
 
Of course they're going to say that.  They have no choice.  They've prevented drilling for decades, all because they're in thrall to that loud, but exceedingly small minority known as environmentalists, or as I like to call them, flat-earthers.  They like to thump their chests and proclaim, "Look, we are saving the earth.  Look how good we are.  Look at us.  Look at us."  And, because they were so busy looking at themselves, they neglected to look around and see the harm they have done. 
 
Until now.  Now, they are looking it square in the face and squealing in abject terror.  "It's not our fault.  We can't drill our way out of this.  It's all the fault of those evil oil company executives.  Boy, just watch us.  We're going to make them pay.  We're going to take all their profits and if that doesn't work, we're going to take their companies.  We're the government.  We can do anything we want.  Look at us.  Look at us." 
 
The reason behind the mantra is simple:  if more drilling  results in more supply and a lowering of cost, there will be proof positive that democrats have been wrong for decades.  And, that is simply not allowed.  Their egos, unlike their brains, are far too large to ever admit that they might have been wrong. 
 
If you want a baby nine months from now, you have sex now.  If you want a college degree four years from now, you go to college now.  If you want to be President of the United States in 2009, you run for the senate in 2004.  If you want oil five years from now, you start drilling now.  Adults understand this. 
 
Unfortunately, we have a man running for president who doesn't.  I refer, of course, to Barack Obama who said that drilling won't help because we're at least five years away from the results of that drilling.  So, we do nothing? We just let the problem get worse?  This is his solution to a national crisis? 
 
I want, and I don't think I'm alone in this, a president who, when confronted with a serious situation, will actually do something to try and solve the problem.  I don't want a man who says, "Since there's nothing that will help now, we're not going to do anything.  Next question, sweetie."  
 
Life is what happens to you when you're planning your life, and it doesn't always give us pretty choices.  Right now, democrats can choose between admitting they were wrong or watch the American economy and, therefore, America go down the drain. 
 
I'm not sure they'll make the right choice.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Comrades in Arms

 
We all know that democrats in Congress are in large part responsible for the pain at the pump.  Just because they're in denial doesn't mean that we have to be, also.  But in addition to just denying their responsibility, they are reacting in a truly frightening way. 
 
Maxine Waters (D-CA) threatened to confiscate the property of the oil companies.  She used the word "socialize" when she meant to say "nationalize" but the concept is the same.  When you own something one day and the government takes it the next, that's confiscation. 
 
It was just last week that Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) appeared on Fox News touting his plan for a 100% tax on the oil industry's profits.  He said it would stop them dead in their tracks.  Most businesses would be stopped dead in their tracks if government took 100% of their profits.  Maybe Mr. Kucinich would understand this if he had to actually work for a living.
 
Folks, this is not American.  It is a complete and utter disgrace that two elected officials of the United States of America are threatening the confiscation of property, especially when they're doing it to cover up their own negligence.
 
This is as totalitarian and communistic as it gets.  This is truly frightening.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just for Laughs

 
Five surgeons are in town for a medical conference.  Over drinks, they debate who makes the best patients on which to operate.
 
The first surgeon says:  "I like accountants on my operating table because when you open them up, everything inside is numbered."
 
The second surgeon says:  I like electricians.  Everything inside them is color-coded."
 
The third surgeon says:  "I like librarians.  Everything inside them is in alphabetical order."
 
The fourth surgeon says:  "I like construction workers.  Those guys understand when you have a few parts left over."
 
The fifth surgeon says:  "You've got it all wrong.  Politicians are the best.  They have no guts, no hearts, no brains, and no spine.  And, their heads and rears are interchangeable."
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One Trick Ponies

 
I have long maintained that the Saudis love their petrodollars.  While some say that the Saudis export the most virulent form of terrorism, I maintain that they would kill such terrorists in a heartbeat if, in fact, these terrorists seriously threatened their stream of income.  If there ever comes a time that Osama bin Hiding or A-Jad make good on their threats to wreak nuclear havoc in the civilized nations of the world - thus endangering Saudi's much-desired petrodollars - they would be gone in the blink of an eye.

As of today, I have been proved half right.  While listening to the news yesterday, I heard that Saudi Arabia was upping its output because oil independence by other nations threatens Saudi Arabia "in the long run." 

You bet it does.  What would the Saudi sheikhs do without oil revenue?  It's not like they have a fallback position, much as America doesn't have one now. 

This is precisely the reason we, and the rest of the world, should have been starving these people out instead of enriching and emboldening them.  And now, they have us over a barrel, literally and figuratively. 

All of the energies of the civilized nations of the world should be brought to bear on (1) in the short term, exploring, drilling, and refining as fast as humanly possible.  This would exert pressure on the OPEC nations to reduce the price in the hopes of remaining on friendly terms with we who are their salvation; and (2) in the long term, breaking oil dependency.  Build nuclear plants.  Build hydrogen vehicles.  Give tax incentives for solar for residential use.  (Don't think solar is feasible for industrial use, and I'm not sure about wind power.  There's a stretch of land I've gone by on which there are dozens upon dozens of windmills.  It looks like some gigantic crucifixion scene.) 

Now is the time.  Saudi Arabia has announced it's vulnerability, as well as it's fear.  We must capitalize on it.  We might even save ourselves in the long run.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy Father's Day

 
To my husband, my father, and all my friends who took on the toughest job they ever loved.
 
Happy Father's Day!
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bush Loses, Detainees Win

 
So blared the headlines from a liberal rag from a nearby town.
 
The very people who want to destroy America have demanded - and been given - rights under the document they would spit on, if given the chance. 
 
"Today, for the first time in our Nation's history, the Court confers a constitutional right to habeas corpus on alien enemies detained abroad by our military forces in the course of an ongoing war."  (Dissent of Justin Antonin Scalia) 
 
Once again, a bare-bones majority of the highest court of the land has done the wrong thing for the wrong reason.  We know where this is going to lead.  The filing of habeas corpus writs by a phalanx of liberal lawyers will be fast and furious.  Ultimately, these lawyers will demand classified documents.  How else are they going to defend their clients?  Ultimately, America will not be able to give these lawyers what they want.  Ultimately, cases will be dismissed and the detainees freed to go out and kill again.  Ultimately, these lawyers will high-five and congratulate themselves on a job well done.  I think America should send these lawyers to Iraq and then revoke their passports.  Let them live, up close and personal, with the folks they freed.  Let's see how they would like that. 
 
Like the five justices responsible for Roe v. Wade, the Jihadi 5 of Boumediene v. Bush rendered a decision that has nothing to do with the facts or the law, and the Constitution certainly wasn't high on their list of priorities.  This decision is all about five people who decided to say, "look what we can do."  This decision was all about five people who wanted to secure their place in history.  This decision is all about immortality.  You know what they say:  there's no such thing as bad publicity as long as they spell your name right. 
 
You know what I say about judicial opinions: the longer they are, the more BS they contain.  The opinion, including the syllabus, came in at a fat 78 pages. 
 
There are some who will agree with this decision because, gosh, it's just so cruel to hold people indefinitely. Well, one, the detainees at Gitmo have never had it so good in their, to date, completely useless lives.  Housing, clothing, three squares a day, complete dental/medical care.  All free of charge.  There are people in America who should have it so good.  And, two, the detention does not have to be indefinite.  The so-called leaders of the War Against the World could just say "enough".  Once the war is over, the detainees could go home, just like all prisoners of war in past conflicts.  So, the indefinite part is their choosing, not ours.
 
There is one foolproof way around this royal proclamation:  America takes no more prisoners.   Every fight is a fight to the death.  These people want to die.  They want to go to some paradise with 72 virgins.  Let's give them what they want.  It's a win-win. 
 
"The Nation will live to regret what the Court has done today.  I dissent."  (Justice Antonin Scalia) 
 
It's entirely possible that Justice Scalia is right.  It's entirely possible that Justices Kennedy, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, & Breyer will live to see the day that the detainees they freed with this decision use the Constitution to wipe the blood of Americans off their swords.
 
America:  strong, safe, and free or everything else is a moot point!
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Getting Closer

 
On April 27, 2007, I posted the following on my blog: 
 
"I believe that the global warming 'crisis' will be solved at the exact moment when politicians realize that high gas prices, higher all around energy costs, and a ruined ecomony might hurt their chances for re-election.  And not a single solitary second before then." 
 
Thanks to high gas prices, we're getting closer to the end of this massive hoax known as climate change.  According to today's column "Decline of the Senate" by Robert D. Novak, 10 democrat senators wrote Harry Reid and said they could not support passage of the global warming/climate change bill reported out of Barbie Doll Boxer's Environment Committee because of its economic impact on their states. 
 
Well, Hallelujah!  Common sense, and from the Senate no less.  I never thought I live to see that again.
 
If the (hopefully) short term pain of higher gas prices leads to the long term gain of an end to the concept that we have only ten years to save the planet, then they're well worth it.  Not to mention the added bonus of the end of the corpulent corpuscle known as Al Gore.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No Kidding!

 
In response to rapidly rising gasoline prices, presidential pretender Barack Obama had this to say:
 
"I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment.  The fact that this is such a shock to American pocketbooks is not a good thing."
 
Oooh!  A chill just ran up my leg.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just For Laughs

 
 
Every morning Snow White would pack lunches for the Seven Dwarves and send them on their way to the mine.  While they were gone, she would tidy up around the house. 
 
One morning, after sending the dwarves off to work, she had a terrible premonition.  She hurried to the mine and saw that it had collapsed.  She began frantically calling out the names of the dwarves.  Hoping to hear something. 
 
All of a sudden she heard a faint voice saying, "Vote for Barack Obama.  Vote for Barack Obama."
 
"Oh thank God", she said.  "Dopey's still alive."
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Parody

 
From: Dick Dirtforbrains (D-IL)

To: Senate Demoncrat Caucus

RE: High Gas Prices

My Fellow Senators,

If we don’t fix this soon, the American public just might start blaming us. I know, I know, we’re largely responsible for the situation, but so far we’ve done a great job of pointing our fingers elsewhere. The people are started to clamor for drilling, but if we do that and the price goes down, everyone will know that it’s our fault that the price went up in the first plan. No sir, we’re not going to take any responsibility whatsoever for our actions. Kudos to Speaker Pelosi for blaming the oilmen in the White House. They’re so unpopular we can blame them for anything and get away with it.

Hauling the oil company executives to Washington, unfortunately, didn’t have the effect we wanted, especially that one jerk who had the nerve to stand up to Maxine Waters (D-CA) when she threatened to socialize the entire oil industry.

Halting shipments to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve was a complete bust, so we’re not going to talk about it at all, to anyone, ever.

One of our last shots is to impose a windfall profits tax. The oil companies need to know that there is a limit on how much profit they can take in this economy. The only problem with this is the fact that all of the proceeds will come to the government - talk about a windfall - and won’t do a thing to lower prices at the pump. Not only that, but we tried this once before and not only did domestic oil production drop, imports increased.

So, if someone tries to point this out, make sure we tell that person that he/she is a racist for not agreeing with something Barack Obama is in favor of. As an aside, the mileage we're going to get out of the guy is fabulous. Getting the Clintons out of our faces was a heckuva a bonus, too.

So, to recap: We take no responsibility whatsoever for the consequences of our complete and utter incompetence with regard to harvesting our own resources. We blame the greedy, evil oil executives. We never, ever talk about halting shipments to the SPR. And, we impose a windfall profits tax so the government will have an additional revenue stream. We’re going to need it because President Obama’s programs won’t come cheap.

As for the American people, who cares. If they really wanted leaders who would look out for them, why did they elect us?  If they had any brains at all, we certainly wouldn't be sitting here. 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi Statement on Largest Ever . . .

 
One-Day Increase in Oil Prices:
 
"With crude oil prices reaching another record high today, Democrats in Congress are fighting to reverse seven years of Bush-Cheney energy policies that have driven up the price at the pump for Americans struggling to make ends meet."
 
For the first 6 years of the Bush-Cheney administration, gas prices were relatively stable.  It has only been with the advent of the democrat majority in 2007 that gas prices have spiraled out of control.  It is decades of incometent democrat policies that have brought us to this point, not 6 years of Bush-Cheney.
 
"Democrats are working to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and reduce gas prices, launch a cleaner, smarter energy future for America that creates hundreds of thousands of green jobs and helps save our planet."
 
What exactly have democrats done to reduce our dependence on foreign oil?  "Launch a cleaner, smarter energy future for America."  What about here and now?  If America's still around, the thousands of "green jobs" that will be created will only replace those have been lost.
 
"The bipartisan Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, now law, includes an increase in vehicle fuel efficiency to 35 miles per gallon in 2020 - the first congressionally-mandated increase in more than three decades - and promotes the use of more advanced American biofuels.  This legislation is a critical first step toward addressing our nation's energy independence and reducing greenhouse gas emissions."
 
What happens between now and 2020?  If vehicle fuel efficiency is so important, why did a democrat-controlled congress not do something in 1992 when they had the chance?  First increase in more than three decades.  Didn't democrats control congress for 60% of that time?  Biofuels are not environmentally friendly and are less efficient.  Plus which, using them starves people.  By the way, climate change is a hoax.
 
"In just the last few months, Congress successfully pressed the Bush Administration into investigating oil market price manipulation, passed a Farm Bill that boosts home-grown advanced biofuels production, halted deliveries to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to increase oil supply in the market, and passed legislation that invests in clean, renewable, and efficient energy technologies, including tax incentives for plug-in hybrid cars, energy efficient homes and applicances."
 
Once again, what about the here and now?  Halting deliveries to the SPR did nothing to reduce prices, neither will a windfall profits tax.
 
"By July 4th, we will work to develop other innovative energy independence legislation that addresses high energy costs and continues to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and we will look into speculation in the energy futures market."
 
In other words, you're going to "work to develop" "legislation" and you're going to "look into" speculation.  In other words, you're not going to do anything except talk.   

How on earth did someone so incredibly incompetent become Speaker of the House?
 
You know what may be the most frightening thing of all about this statement, Pelosi might actually believe what she's saying.  She might actually believe that she's doing something to resolve the crisis.  Either that or she's just lying to us.   

And she is, God help us, only a few heartbeats away from the Oval Office. 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ignorance on Display


I had occasion yesterday to read an op-ed in the newspaper. I was simply flabbergasted at the author’s ignorance.

Firstly, she says “When George W. Bush was first ‘elected’ . . .” For all of you irrational folks still disputing the 2000 election:

George Bush won Florida and, therefore, the election. There was never a time he was behind Al Gore. He never lost a recount. The Supreme Court did not appoint him to the White House. It simply refused to allow the machinations of the democrats to prevail.  There's no need for the use of scare quotes.

President Bush has led us into the greatest energy crisis we have witnessed in more than 30 years. When a minimum-wage worker spends an entire day’s wage just to fill the tank, it is time for Congress to do something.”

Congress has done something. It’s refused to allow America to access its own resources, thereby insuring that prices go up. The price of gas did not begin to spiral out of control until the democrats took back congress. Prices have doubled since January 2007. Prior to that, i.e., for the first 6 years of the Bush presidency, prices were stable.  Today's energy crisis can be laid at the feet of democrats.

When the poor, the elderly and others living on a fixed income can no longer heat their homes, it’s time for Congress to do something.”

Congress has done something. It’s refused to allow America to access its own resources, thereby insuring that prices go up.

When food costs spiral out of control as a direct result of fuel prices and jeopardize the health and welfare of untold Americans, it’s time for Congress do to something.”

Congress has done two things. One, it’s refused to allow America to access its own resources, thereby insuring that prices go up.  Two, it has demanded that corn be used for ethanol instead of for food, thereby insuring that the price of food goes up.

After 12 years of Republican misrule, the current Democratic Congress is making an effort, but it must go further quickly. Last year, it passed the first increase in fuel efficiency standards in more than 30 years.

For 18 of those thirty years, i.e., 60%, democrats were in charge. And, it was a democrat congress in 1992 that killed the last proposal to raise fuel efficiency standards.

One of the most pristine environments left on Earth, ANWR . . .

Here’s what the Washington Post had to say about the section of ANWR where drilling would take place: "That part of the ANWR is one of the bleakest, most remote places on this continent, and there is hardly any other where drilling would have less impact on the surrounding life.”
 
On the coastal plain where drilling would take place, the Arctic winter lasts for 9 months. It is dark continuously for 56 days in midwinter. Temperatures, including the wind chill factor, reach –110 degrees. When the spring thaw occurs, there are thousands upon thousands of puddles, wherein mosquitoes reside and breed.

According to Jonah Goldberg who has actually visited there (as opposed to the author who obviously hasn’t), “There’s little doubt that for much of human history most reasonable people would have considered this spot the definition of the word ‘godforsaken’”.

Sound pristine to you?

Cities across the country are banning plastic bags . . .

Who wanted those plastic bags in the first place? That’s right, environmentalists, who didn’t want us to cut down trees for grocery bags.

A real investment in new forms of energy could create more than 3 millions new jobs.

That's an abstract statistic.  Here's a real one:  America imports 5.4 million barrels of oil a day.  At $140 a barrel, that’s $756,000,000 a day for oil, or $275,940,000,000 a year; at $150 a barrel, that’s $810,000,000 a day, or $295,650,000,000 a year. Think how many Americans could be employed with that money. 

. . .rebuilding infrastructure to accommodate smaller cars and bikes . . .

How will the smaller infrastructure deal with the semis that are the lifeblood of American commerce? How much will rebuilding all of this nation’s highways cost?

If ignorance is bliss, this woman is ecstatic.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive