About Me

Name:Roxanna M.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

A Rocks' Axiom

 
I'm not just an observer of the legal field, I'm a member of it.  My husband and I have a combined total of 73 years in the land of jurisprudence.
 
One of the things I have learned is:  the longer an opinion, the more BS it contains.  Not only is the BS necessary to explain the inherently unexplainable, incomprehensible, ridiculous, contemptible, it serves to cover up the fact that the opinion is lacking in brilliance and substance and is nothing more than an infliction upon the populace of the opinions of the black-robed b@$t@rd$ who wrote it.
 
In re Marriage Cases, the declaration from the California Supreme Court that it can do whatever it wants whenever it wants, came in at a fat 121 pages.  With concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as the cast of characters, the total came to 172 pages.
 
I rest my case.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Travesty of Justices

 
Once again, We the People learn that the only constitutional "right", state or federal, that has any restraints on it is the right to keep and bear arms, i.e., the Second Amendment.  Other "rights" real or imagined, apparently can have no restrictions whatsoever. 
 
Thirty plus years ago, the United States Supreme Court, in an act of infamy by a bare-bones majority, declared that abortion was a constitutional "right", even though that word is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution.  Subsequent rulings from all kinds of court threw out decisions that in any way limited a woman's "right" to choose.  Leaving us where we are today:  full-term babies are being murdered with judicial and legislative sanction.
 
Now, the California Supreme Court has declared that people of the same sex have the constitutional "right" to marry.  Interestingly enough, also by a bare-bones majority.
 
Tired of the Ninth Circuit getting all the glory, the following individuals decided it was time for their (sordid) 15 minutes of fame:
 
Chief Justice Ronald George:  A.B. from Princeton; J.D. from Stanford Law School
    
Associate Justice Carlos Moreno:  B.A. from Yale; J.D. from Stanford Law School
 
Associate Justice Joyce Kennard:  B.A. and J.D. from University of Southern California
 
Associate Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar:  B.A. from Berkeley; J.D. from University of California School of Law (Boalt Hall); prior to serving on the Supreme Court, she served on the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco.
 
According to Article VI, Section 16, of the California Constitution, the term for Supreme Court justices is 12 years.
 
Mr. George will have to stand for re-election in 2010.
 
Mr. Moreno will have to stand for re-election in 2012.
 
Ms. Werdegar will have to stand for re-election in 2014.
 
Mr. Kennard will have to stand for re-election in 2018.
 
Of course, this assumes that the people of California will tolerate their presence that long.
 
Next up:  How to impeach a sitting Supreme Court Justice.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Real Endangered Species

 
Despite the fact that the polar bear population has doubled in the last 50 years, it has now been listed as an endangered species.  This, of course, has nothing to do with polar bears and everything to do with environmentalists and global warmists continuing to run amok in their efforts to destroy civilization as we know it in favor of some utopia that exists only in their fevered imaginations.
 
The real endangered species in the world today are men and women with brains and backbones.  Brains to to see these hoaxes for what they are, and backbones to tell these hucksters, "You're full of $#!+."
 
Unfortunately, no such person is running for President and precious few are in Congress or the Judiciary.
 
Tick, tick . . . America is slipping away . . . tick, tick, tick
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Inconvenient Truths

 
The United States leads the world in both energy efficiency per unit of GDP and control of CO2 emissions.  According to the 2008 Index of Leading Economic Indicators, U.S. emissions grew by only 6.6% from 1997 to 2004 vs. 18% for the world as a whole and 21.1% for those nations that signed the Kyoto Protocol.
 
In other words, America didn't need no stinking Kyoto Protocol, and the Powers That Be in this country should stop trying to destroy this country with their fanatical belief in this hoax.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What A Bunch Of Boobs!

 
First Congress brings us the high cost of gas by refusing to allow us to harvest our own resources.  Then, when the inevitable consequences of such short-sightedness occur, the members thereof blame everyone but themselves, promising investigations and the like.  By golly, they're going to get to the bottom of the problem.  NEWSFLASH, they are the bottom of the problem, they just don't seem to know it and they think we're too stupid to know it.
 
Now, Congress has voted to suspend shipments to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.  The Senate's Head Wienie, Harry Reid, calls this "a good first step" but that "much more needs to be done."  Well no kidding!
 
What needed to be done for the past decades is more drilling and more refining.  But no, dimocrats weren't going to allow that, and gutless wonder Republicans went along with them.  Like IBD said recently, "Democrats kowtowed to the wishes of their environmental, supporters over the basic needs of 300 million American citizens".  Maybe if more of those 300 million American citizens had contributed to the campaign coffers of these yahoos in DC, these very same yahoos might have actually paid some attention to them.  Gotta pay if you want to play.
 
Now, once again, there is a crisis that Congress caused.  And, once again, it is totally unprepared, unable, unwilling and ill-equipped to deal with that crisis.
 
The purpose of the SPR is to ensure that the U.S. has enough oil supplies to see it through a national crisis.  So, first Congress imperils our economy and our national security by keeping us dependent on foreign oil and now it intends to make matters worse by preventing us from having a sufficient reserve in the event of a national crisis.
 
Congress displays, yet again, its complete and utter unfitness to lead this great country. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Couldn't Have Said It Better Myself

 
An excellent article in Investor's Business Daily entitled "Who Is Really Responsible for the High Prices You Pay For Gasoline?" hits the nail square on the head.
 
"For the last 28 years, Democrats in Congress and a few Republicans have again and again opposed our drilling for oil in Alaska's ANWR area when we knew it contained at least 10 billion barrels of oil we could be using now."
 
*  For the past 31 years, Congress repeatedly prevented us from building any new oil refineries that we now badly need.
 
*  More recently, congressional Democrats defeated and discouraged any bill that would let us drill in the deep sea 100 miles out.  However, it's OK for China to drill there.
 
*  As a further indictment of our Congress, since the 1980's it has continually stopped all building of nuclear power plants while France, Germany and, yes, Japan, plus 12 other major nations, did build plants and now get 20% to 80% of their energy from their wise and safe nuclear plant investments.
 
*  From 1990 to 2000, U.S. crude oil demand rapidly accelerated by 7.41 quadrillion BTUs, according to Department of Energy data.  And our rate of foreign oil dependency dramatically increased while our domestic oil production steadily declined.
 
*  Under the eight Clinton years, U.S. oil production declined 1,349,000 barrels per day, or 19%, while our foreign imports increased 3,574,000 barrels per day, or 45%.
 
IBD asks the following questions:
 
Were Democrats and members of Congress together merely short-sighted, with only a few having any real business experience?
 
Were they just ignorant about economics - the fact that the law of supply and demand determines the price of all commodities such as oil, steel, copper, and lumber?
 
Were they simply and utterly irresponsible and incompetent in their actions that led us to become dangerously dependent on increasing oil imports from foreign countries?
 
IBD thinks it's all of the above.
 
"The unintended consequence of the Congress members' poor judgment and meddling micromanagement of U.S. energy policy is that they actually hurt most the very people they always profess to be able to help . . . Democrats kowtowed to the wishes of their environmental supporters over the basic needs of 300 million American citizens . . . It is a national disgrace that all they now know how to do is relentlessly criticize, complain and condemn.  They always attempt to blame, investigate and scapegoat someone else, in this case U.S. oil companies, when Congress is the true villain of ineptness for constantly blocking and obstructing every effort for us to become more productive and less dependent on foreign oil."
 
"Do those now in Congress really think Middle America's voters are so gullible that they will believe that its latest best and brightest answer to increasing our supply or oil and gas is to slap a 25% windfall penalty tax on oil companies and remove all other incentives for oil companies to drill and explore for oil." 
 
In a word, yes, that's exactly what they believe.
 
In the meantime, the children in charge of this country are not about to take any responsibility whatsoever for their criminal incompetence.  They're going to obfuscate, parry, dissemble, deflect, and downright lie about how we got where we are.  Don't even think of asking them to do something constructive.  They don't know how.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Happy Mother's Day

 
Planned Parenthood, the number one provider of abortions in the country, has launched a Mother's Day Campaign for donations.
 
"If you like, you can make your gift in honor of someone you love for Mother's Day.  We'll send that special person a special card saying that you've chosen to make a gift to Planned Parenthood Federation of America in her or his name."
 
Think of all the contributions Planned Parenthood could have had without all the abortions it performed.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This Is America . . .

 
We don't need no stinking truth!
 
Barack Obama consistently gets an overwhelming majority of the black vote.  This is the truth, but if we say it, we're "racist".
 
Some people are not going to vote for Obama because he's black.  This is the truth, but if we say it, we're "racist".
 
Some of the comments made by Jeremiah Wright are despicable, as is the fact that he made them from the pulpit of a church.  This is the truth, but if we say it, we're "racist".
 
We have every right to question Obama's ties to this man, but if we do so, we're "racist".
 
Obama recently sacked an advisor who, in his spare time, held meetings with Hamas, which might explain why Ahmed Yousef, the leader of Hamas, endorsed Obama.  But, when John McCain truthfully pointed this out, Obama said:  "This is offensive, and I think it's disappointing.  Because John McCain always says 'I am not going to run that kind of politics,' and to engage in that kind of smear is unfortunate, particularly because my policy toward Hamas has been no different than his.  I've said it's a terrorist organization and we should not negotiate with them unless they recognize Israel, renounce violence, and unless they are willing to abide by previous accords between the Palestinians and the Israelis.  So for him to toss out comments like that I think is an example of him losing his bearings as he pursues this nomination.  We don't need name calling in this debate."
 
McCain told the truth.  He didn't smear Obama, and it was Obama who resorted to name calling.  How "racist" of me to point this out. 
 
The list goes one.  If we vote against Hillary because she's a woman, we're "sexist".  If we vote against McCain because he's old, we're "ageist". 
 
But, if we vote for them, we're "racist".
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Quote of the Week

 
"It's not math anymore, it's psychodrama.  If she can't have it, no one can have it.  If she has to tear the party apart, she will."
 
Peggy Noonan
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Happened?

 
"In a relatively short amount of time, Clinton has gone from being the inevitable winner to being the underdog to being a dead woman walking."
 
Roger Simon (Politico.com)
 
It wasn't all that long ago that Dick Morris, a man who, arguably, knows the Clintons better than anybody, wrote a book saying that Hillary Clinton was going to be the candidate and the Republican's only hope of victory was Condoleezza Rice.
 
I never understood the "inevitable" talk.  I realize that she thought she was inevitable because that's all she heard in the echo chamber of her mind.  But, how did that concept get passed on to the public?  What made other people say the same thing?  Some kind of collective brainwashing, i.e., say something long enough and loud enough and everybody will start to believe it?
 
Look how far we've come in a year.
 
And that, I think, is the problem.  The more America saw her, the less they liked her.  Let's face it, the Clintons, whether jointly or individually, have been in our face for some 16 years now, and this interminable campaign makes both of them seem omnipresent.  Maybe we're sick of them. 
 
Or, maybe her "mistake" regarding Bosnia reminded people that the dark, underlying current of the Clinton administration was dishonesty.  Maybe she reminds us of the successive investigations, the vanishing and reappearing records, and the myriad variations on "I don't remember", "I don't recall", etc., etc., etc.  Maybe we don't want to go back to a time when "is" turned out to mean something entirely different than what we thought it meant. 
 
Maybe she reminds us that, despite their millions in book advances, they removed items from the White House and registered like newlyweds so that other people could furnish their million-dollar homes.  Maybe we think her determination to stay in the race is more desperation than pluck.
 
Whatever the reason, she appears to have worn out her welcome.  Wouldn't want to be the person who has to break it to her.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pathetic Specimen of the Breed

 
I still remember the presidential election of 2000.  I remember watching the election results.  I remember the liberal media calling Florida for Gore even though the televised vote count showed Bush ahead.  I remember all that happened after that, the back and forth in to the wee hours.  I remember going to bed believing that Bush had won and waking up to hear that Florida was, once again, in play.  I remember the recounts and lawsuits. 
 
Most of all I remember thinking "what a pathetic specimen of the breed", as Al Gore desperately clung to his presidential ambitions, refusing to acknowledge that he had lost.
 
I am reminded of those feelings today.  According to the news this morning, the misery toll from Cyclone Nargis is:  22,000 dead, 41,000 missing, and 1 million homeless.  The death toll is expected to rise and possibly exceed 100,000.
 
And what does Mr. Hot Air have to say?  Global warming was responsible. 
 
More and more scientists are coming around to the fact that the global warming "crisis" is nothing more than a hoax.  It has been confirmed that the temperature of the planet has not risen in a decade.  It has been confirmed that there is less solar activity.  NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has confirmed that the Pacific Decadal Oscillation's cool phase shift could bring colder temperatures for the next 20-30 years.  A German study has predicted cooler ocean temperatures because of the Meridional Overturning Circulation entering a weak cycle.
 
Like the greedy, grasping Clintons, Al Gore has decided that having millions of dollars is not enough.  He wants millions and millions and millions more besides and that won't happen unless the global warming/climate change myth is maintained.  
 
It speaks volumes about this man that his first thought in the wake of this tragedy was nothing more than self-promotion in the pursuit of money.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

That's Rich!

 
In favor of a federal gas-tax "holiday", Hillary Clinton said today that oil companies "have record profits that they frankly are just sitting there counting because they are not doing anything new to earn it; they are just taking advantage of what's going on.  We ought to say, 'Wait a minute, we'd rather have the oil companies pay the gax tax than the drivers of North Carolina, especially truck drivers, or the farmers, or other people who have to commute long distances."
 
Where to begin.
 
Firstly, she isn't one to talk about "excess profits".  She and her husband have received over $100 million in the past seven years or so and every single one of those dollars was an excess profit.
 
Secondly, is she really so stupid to think that the oil companies would pay the federal taxes without passing that cost on to us?  Or, does she think we're too stupid to know that?
 
Thirdly, what on earth is the federal government doing to "earn" the 18.4-cents-per-gallon gas tax and the 24.4-cents-per-gallon diesel tax that it is getting?  Talk about "not doing anything to earn it."  Talk about "just taking advantage of what's going on."
 
A gas-tax holiday should be just that.  We don't pay the tax.  Oil companies don't pay the tax.  The federal behemoth that brought us this disaster should just eat it.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A World Gone Mad

 
Unbelievable!  The Weekly Standard reports that The Swiss Federal Ethics Committee on Non-Human Biotechnology has decided that plants have "dignity" and that the arbitrary killing of flora is "morally wrong."  I guess this naturally follows the provision the Swiss inserted into their constitution requiring "account to be taken of the dignity of creation when handling animals, plants and other organisms."
 
Part of the poppycock emanating from this panel provides that "living organisms should be considered morally for their own sake because they are alive," that humans cannot claim "absolute ownership" over plants, and that "individual plants have an inherent worth," which means that people "may not use them just as we please, even if the plant community is not in danger, or if our actions do not endanger the species, or if we are not acting arbitrarily."
 
In other words, "killing" plants for food is okay, but don't you dare mow your lawn?
 
My gosh!  Has the world really come to this?
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are You Kidding Me?

 
The World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY) (whammy!?!) has denounced the film "Fitna" by Geert Wilders of the Netherlands.  Fitna is Arabic for strife.
 
Claiming that it is an "anti-koran" film, the secretary-general of WAMY said:  "These kinds of attacks by so-called sane European politicians and scholars will lead to very serious repercussions, pushing mankind to a situation of chaos and conflict."  WAMY called the film "a new obstacle to block any sensible dialogue between religions" and said "It is high time that the West moves quickly to control the damage.  They don't understand how much Muslims love and respect their Prophet.  If we do something against Christianity or target Christian interests in retaliation, the Netherlands, Europe and the whole world would object.  But Islam does not teach that, it advocates peace and co-existence.  I'm afraid that the Western world has failed to understand the severity of the problem."
 
In what alternative universe does this idiot live?
 
On September 11, 2001, nineteen losers hijacked four planes and slaughtered nearly 3,000 people. 
 
We understand that it isn't us "pushing mankind to a situation of chaos and conflict."  We understand that it isn't us who is an "obstacle" to "sensible dialogue between religions."  We understand that islam does not advocate "peace and co-existence."  We understand that we have no obligation to move "quickly to control the damage." 
 
In short, we understand the "severity of the problem."  We also understand that it's impossible to have a dialogue with people who won't accept that they are the problem. 

A lot like dealing with liberals, isn't it?
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Of Course It Won't

 
I read today that the Clinton Library will not make available to the public the documents that Sandy Berger illegally took from the National Archives in 2003.  Of course it won't.
 
According to a letter from the library, these documents are "restricted in their entirety" and are "classified in the interest of national defense or foreign policy" and contain "confidential communications requesting or submitting advice between the president and his advisors, or between such advisors."
 
If Bill Clinton had wanted these documents made available to the public, he wouldn't have had Sandy Burglar steal them in the first place.  These documents must remain secret because neither of the Clintons want anybody to know that the Clinton administration, which Hillary has adopted as her own, dropped the ball on terrorism and is directly responsible for the events of 9/11.
 
So, what we have here, is Hillary Clinton out having a field day with Obama's relationship with Jeremiah Wright while she ignores her own with a man who has said and done things far worse than Mr. Wright could ever imagine. 

And, she's getting away with it.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive