About Me

Name:Roxanna M.
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Quote of the Week

 
"It may surprise Americans to discover that the United States is the third-largest oil producer, behind Saudi Arabia and Russia.  We could be producing more, but Congress has put large areas of potential supply off-limits.  These include the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and parts of Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.  By government estimates, these areas may contain 25-30 billion barrels of oil (against about 30 billion of proven U.S. reserves today) and 80 trillion cubic feet or more of natural gas (compared with about 200 tcf of proven reserves).
 
What keeps these areas closed are exaggerated enrivonmental fears, strong prejudice against oil companies and sheer stupidity."
 
Robert Samuelson, Newsweek and Washington Post Contributing Editor
 
Calling the actions of Congress "sheer stupidity" is giving them way too much credit.  Keeping us dependent on a spigot that can be turned off at any time has endangered our economy, our way of life, and our national security.  Congress' action, or inaction to put it more correctly, is nothing less than criminal.  And don't think for one second that this body of fools doesn't grasp this concept.  No, rather than admit they were wrong and accept responsibility for their behavior, which might cause some people to actually think about whether or not to re-elect them, they have decided to loudly and continually blame Bush/Cheney/Big Oil.  Most importantly, they're banking on the fact that we're stupid enough to buy what they're peddling. 
 
Since America appears poised to put the last remaining branch of government - democrats already have Congress and the Judiciary - back into democrat hands, they just might be right. 
 
Friends don't let friends vote for democrats.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Denounce Me?

 
 
The right Reverend Wright's on a bender,
and his message for O less than tender.
"Denounce me" he says,
"let me show you the ways
I can put your campaign through the blender."
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Baby Steps to Health Care Reform

 
The health care industry cannot be fixed in one fell swoop, nor should it.  We need to keep what works and get rid of what doesn't.  Here, in my humble opinion, are the first steps we need to take.
 
1.  Health insurance should be for catastrophic care only.  For far too long now the myth has been peddled that we can have all the health care we want for a $10 co-pay.  Such stupidity has led to the high costs we're now experiencing.  What's the old adage:  If you want more of something, subsidize it, which is exactly what we have done.  The doctor visit is $100.00 (for demonstration purposes only), but you only pay $10.00.  Therefore, insurance has subsidized the other $90.00.  How much would your car insurance cost if you used it every time you bought new tires or had a tune-up?  Health insurance should be no different.  It makes no economic sense to pay $500.00 a month for insurance just to get a $10.00 visit.  Of course, the common sense economics of this is lost on politicians.  Indeed, it's lost on a lot of people.
 
People first started abusing the system when they thought they were getting something for nothing.  They got free health insurance from their employment and only had to pay $10.00 to see the doctor.  Such a deal!  Remember, we don't appreciate what we don't pay for.  Then, after insurance kept getting more and more expensive, the thought was, "well I'm paying for it, I might as well use it."  You see the vicious cycle. 

This would also stop the abuse of those who run to the doctor every time their nose runs, or those who think of doctor visits as a social event.
 
2.  Too radical for you?  Then get rid of government mandates.  Legislatures just keep mandating more and more coverage, which does nothing but add to the bill.  If I want chiropractic coverage, then let me pay for it.  Same goes for everything else.  If all I want is catastrophic care, I should be allowed that choice.  Unfortunately, the California Legislature - which has been in the back pocket of the insurance industry for decades - denies me that choice.
 
3.  Separate health care from employment.  This has been another factor in increased costs.  Insurance companies just keep raising the premiums, taunting businesses with "what are you going to do about it."  This made sense when people worked all their lives for one company.  In this day and age of mobility, however, it is an antiquated concept. 
 
4.  Make health care providers pay for their own mistakes.  The current system allows doctors to make you sicker and then bill your health insurance for the privilege.  That needs to come to a screeching halt right now.  You get an infection that could have been prevented, the health care provider has to pick up the tab.  A doctor removes the wrong kidney, then he picks up your health care for that condition for the rest of your life.  You get the idea.  This idea has merit on two fronts:  (1) insurance won't be picking up the tab; and (2) doctors just might start being more careful.  I know, the argument against this will be that hospitals and doctors will have to increase their charges to cover their own negligence.  Exactly how would that be different from what they're doing now?
 
5.  Open up the market.  Let insurance companies peddle their wares in all states.
 
6.  Grasp the concept that America already has socialized medicine, it's just being run by the insurance industry.  A health care provider can charge whatever he wants, it's the insurance company that decides how much to pay him.  A health care provider wants to schedule a test, it's the insurance company that gives the green or red light.  We have given far too much power and wealth to the insurance industry, and they should start being nicer to us, 'cause if they don't, government is going to grab everything and they'll be broke.
 
7. Grasp the concept that We the People have power.  Get off your lazy butts and start contacting your elected officials.  Make them actually do something to earn their salaries, their perks, and their exalted opinions of themselves.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

There's No Money In Good Health

 
A friend of mine passed away last week.  She died from the cancer her doctor told her she didn't have.  She bought into the myth that regular trips to the doctor will keep you healthy.
 
Like a good little girl, she went for her yearly mammogram.  And every year, the doctor told her she was fine when, in fact, the cancer was growing.  When the doctor finally "saw" it, he assured her that it was small.  She was relieved and thrilled.  Such feelings were short-lived however when further tests showed that the "small" cancer in her breast was now in her lungs, requiring surgery and chemotherapy.  And now, she's dead.
 
We have the greatest health care system in the world, or so we're told.  So, why didn't the doctor see the cancer before it had metastasized?  Isn't that the purpose of a yearly mammogram?   What's the purpose of going if doctors don't know what they're looking at or looking for?  My husband represented the widower of a woman whose doctor didn't see her breast cancer until it was stage IV metastatic.  The irony was that the doctor died before the woman did. 
 
A recent episode of "Grey's Anatomy" showed the Izzie character running $120,000 worth of unnecessary tests because she wanted to "find" something and win some contest.  Don't laugh.  Doctors run unnecessary tests all the time because they make money doing so.  Of course, their high-minded excuse is that they need to do so to (1) prevent malpractice claims and (2) keep you healthy.  Don't you believe it.  Infections are the easiest thing to prevent, yet the easiest thing to get.  Why prevent an infection when you can make more money for treating one?  Why find cancer when it's small when you can make more money for treating it when it's bigger? 

No one tells us that doctors are the third leading cause of death in America, behind cancer and heart disease. Doctors will kill more people in one month than the Iraq war has killed in 5 years, and we're vilified if we want to sue one who has caused us harm. 
 
There's no money in good health, and doctors have no interest whatsoever in keeping you that way.  Their only interest is in keeping you coming to see them.  They prey on our fear of death, and their greed and fraud is a major contributing factor to the high price of health care.  Ironic, isn't it, that as the cost goes up, the quality goes down. 

 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is There No Such Thing As Shame Anymore?

 
In her Earth Day address, Nancy Pelosi said:  "The Bible tells us in the Old Testament, 'To minister to the needs of God's creation is an act of worship.  To ignore those needs is to dishonor God who made us.'  On this Earth Day, and every day, let us honor the earth and our future generations with a commitment to fight climate change."
 
Small problem.  The Old Testament, apparently, says no such thing.  Biblical scholars have been unable to find such a verse.  I asked my dad, my very own go to Biblical scholar, and he could find nothing either.  There's just something inherently wrong with misquoting the Bible, especially if it's in the name of the greatest hoax in history. 
 
Tell me, how do we honor God when we starve the less fortunate among us because we're growing corn to put in our gas tanks?  Elitism doesn't come any bigger than that. 
 
And, of course, liberals are leading the way. 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just As Predicted . . .

 
. . . and right on schedule.
 
The Congressional CYA over high and rising oil prices has begun.  And, just as predicted, dimocrats are blaming it on Bush.  I'm shocked.
 
According to the Fox News Ticker this morning, dimocrat lawmakers are threatening to stall multi-million dollar arm sales to Saudi Arabia, UAE, and other OPEC nations unless Bush starts using "leverage" to press for more oil.  Dims say that Bush is not doing enough.
 
Beg some more, Mr. President, even though we're the ones who won't allow drilling in ANWR or anywhere else there's oil in America.  Beg some more, Mr. President, even though it's all our fault for being too stupid to see beyond the end of our noses.  Beg some more, Mr. President, because rising gas costs might cost us our jobs and we have no ability whatsoever to do anything other than feed at the public trough.  It's not like we have any usable job skills.  Beg some more, Mr. President, because somebody has got to fix what we broke and, quite frankly, we're far too incompetent.  Like the children we are, we can only get into messes.  We expect adults to get us out of them.
 
Beg some more, Mr. President, beg some more.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Declaration of Independence

 
   When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. 
 
   We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.  That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.  That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.  Prudence, indeed will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.  But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
 
   America is rapidly reaching the point our Founding Fathers did when this document was written, due solely to a government that has shown remarkable indifference to this nation and its people for decades now.  Gas is at $4.00 a gallon and rising daily.  Had our government had the foresight of a flea, we would have begun drilling in ANWR a decade or more ago and that precious fuel would most likely now be available for our use. 
 
   But no.  The arrogant, ignorant, shortsightedness of America's elite led them to believe that they could keep OPEC countries in line indefinitely.  No need to develop our own resources, no need to develop alternative sources of energy, OPEC would continue to supply us with the lifeblood of the world for as long as we needed, as economically as we needed.  If ignorance is bliss, these elites were ecstatic.
 
   And while America slept, its false sense of security intact, these nations tested their wings.  And they learned they were the ones with the power.  Too late America realized the stranglehold it is in.  What if these countries started charging $1,000 a barrel for oil?  Since we have nothing to fall back on, what exactly can we do about it?  Our government has left us defenseless and at the mercy of people who are even now salivating at the prospect that our downfall might be just around the corner. 
 
   And, their stupidity doesn't end there.  In an effort to "fix" the global warming/climate change "crisis" - a hoax that has become a living, breathing monster, devouring every ounce of common sense in its path - our government has demanded the growing of fuel for our vehicles.  This remarkably stupid action has resulted in the doubling and tripling of food prices around the world.  Food riots around the world.  Haiti's government toppled.  Shoppers in California being asked to voluntarily limit the amount of rice they buy.  Trying to "fix" global warming/climate change is starving people now, the very thing they thought they could avoid by playing God.  Worse yet, there appears to be no sign that our government grasps its stupidity.  Even with all that's happening, it still plans to put its global warming/climate change plans into action.

   What's going to happen in America when voluntary rationing becomes mandatory rationing?  What's going to happen in America when gas is $5, $6, or more a gallon?  What's going to happen in America when first the little business are forced to close, followed by the big businesses, and everyone, not just the little people, have to start doing without?  

   If we aren't already in crisis, we're pretty dang close.  And, as we all know, our government is not good at handling crises, so hard to get anything done when you're busy pointing fingers.  But, if I was this government, I would remove my head from where it has been so firmly lodged for so very long now and start thinking up real solutions to the very real problems facing us.  

   I don't really care that their sole impetus is getting re-elected, as long as it gets their fat fannies in gear.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Irony Defined

 
One of the reasons we have been given for the need to do something about global warming/climate change right now is that not doing something will lead to mass starvation around the world, which in turn will cause wars as people compete for the dwindling food supplies.  Well as daily headlines are shouting out, trying to "fix" the "crisis" is what is actually causing starvation and fights over food. 

And, as more and more land is devoted to growing corn for our gas tanks, the problem will only worsen.  Furthermore, there are reports that the use of ethanol not only makes global warming worse, it creates more pollution. 

For decades now, Congress hasn't taken an active interest in looking out for America's best interests.  It has made sure that we remained dependent on foreign oil.  Now, they have jumped on the global warming/climate change bandwagon and said giddy-up.  So, as the economy worsens with the price of gas and food rising on a daily basis, as a direct result of their willful and sustained ignorance and incompetence, what is Congress doing to actually help America?  Well, I read where the House of Representatives is going to look into whether or not the college Bowl Championship Series is illegal. 

Thank God these bloated gasbags have found something to take their minds off steroids in baseball.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not Even Close

 
The following is a cleaned-up version of an e-mail I received from a friend of mine today:
 
These are our choices for President:
 
Hillary Clinton:  a lawyer who is married to a lawyer
 
Barack Obama:  a lawyer who is married to a lawyer
 
John McCain:  a war hero who is married to a woman who owns a beer distributorship
 
Why did Al Gore invent the internet if not for the transmission of such gems.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

And God Laughed

 
In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.  He said let there be light, and there was light.  He said let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.  And it was so.  He said let the land produce vegetation, seed-bearing plants, and trees that bear fruit with seed in it.  And it was so.  He said let the water teem with living creatures and let birds fly across the expanse of the sky and let the land produce living creatures.  And it was so.  Then God made man in his own image, male and female He created them, to rule over the fish of the sea, the birds of the air, over the livestock, and over all the earth.  And God saw all that He had made, and it was very good.
 
And the birds of the air and the livestock of the earth, together with man, lived for thousands of years.  And they exhaled carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.  And the carbon dioxide nourished the vegetation, seed-bearing plants, and trees that bear fruit with seed in it, which in turned cleaned the air so that the birds of the air and the livestock of the earth, together with man, could live.  And it was good.
 
But then The Left declared that man was greater than God and began to implement plans to alter all that God had created.  The Left declared that carbon dioxide was a greenhouse gas and harmful to the planet.  In the place of gasoline, The Left said there must be biofuels, and it was so.  And The Left said that the ground once used to grow food for the birds of the air and the livestock of the earth, together with man, must be used to grow biofuels.  And it was so.
 
Then the birds of the air and the livestock of the earth, together with man, began to starve.  And man began to fight against man in order to feed himself and his family.  And The Left said it was good, because the ones who were dying didn't count. 
 
And The Left said that more land must be used for growing biofuels, and it was so.  And as more land was used to grow biofuels, there was less ground to grow food for man.  Man began to die off in even greater numbers, and The Left said it was good because only the strong survive.
 
And then one day The Left looked around and saw what it had done.  The Left did not know how to grow its own food, and the people who did had died.  The Left did not know how to make its own clothes, and the people who did had died.  The Left did not know how to build the motor vehicles that ran on biofuels, and the people who did had died.  The Left did not know how to support itself, and the people who were the engine of the economy had died.
 
And God laughed at the folly of man.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who Said It?

 
Where the American invasion stands now, after five years, is failure and defeat.  It is all a silly episode to disguise failure in Iraq so Bush would avoid making a decision on withdrawing troops, which is considered to be a declaration of defeat in Iraq, and move forward the problem to be the next president's issue.
 
If you're tempted to say a democrat, no one could blame you.  After all, the democrats want America to lose in Iraq.  They've been saying so for so long now that their never-ending drumbeat is merely white noise for us, something we hear in the background but don't pay any attention to.  They want the war to be a huge stain on the George W. Bush presidency.  Of course, the consequences of failure, which they will just blame on Bush, are far to much for them to grasp, otherwise they wouldn't be rooting for it.
 
No, the author of the quote is none other than Ayman al-Zawahiri (Zawahri), second in command under Osama bin Hiding, which was aired on several militant islamist web sites after the recent testimony of General Petraeus.
 
Kinda scary when you can't tell the good guys from the bad anymore.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thank God!

 
"Daschle Not Interested in Vice President Position"
 
KELO-TV website (Sioux Falls, South Dakota)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Where Are The Feminists?

 
I predict that the removal of 416 children from the compound of a fundamentalist polygamous cult in Texas will create shockwaves in this country for some time to come.
 
DNA tests are going to have to be conducted on everyone because no one knows who's related to who.  According to the testimony of a state child welfare investigator, the cult indulges in the practice of taking one man's "wives and children" and "reassigning" them to another man.  At least five girls under the age of 18 are currently pregnant or already have children.  And, some of the "women" who have given birth at the compound have been as young as 13.  Investigators believe there was a pattern of underage girls given in "marriage" to older men.
 
We saw the interview of three women who appeared to be nothing more than brainwashed zombies defend these practices.  At the court hearing yesterday, "dozens of mothers sat timidly in their long cotten dresses, long underwear even in the spring heat, and braided upswept hair." 
 
What we have here are allegations of slavery.  Men with harems.  Women and children being passed from man to man.  Middle-aged men having sex with little girls. 
 
So, where are the feminists?  Where is the outrage that sexual slavery might very well be flourishing right here in America under the guise of freedom of religion?  Shouldn't the movement be standing up for women who are being treated as nothing more than possessions and little girls who are being treated like sex toys?
 
Where are the feminists?
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ever Thought About It

 
A friend of mine dropped me an e-mail this morning telling me, among other things, what he remembers about when his oldest brother went to work for the FBI as a fingerprint clerk.  He said the background check was beyond belief, as the FBI went back to his childhood years, including grade school friends and teachers.  Yet, no background checks are done on those running for President because the Constitution does not require one. 

All the Constitution says is:  "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States." 

With his history of draft dodging, speaking against America on foreign soil in a time of war, and womanizing, Bill Clinton could never have passed a background check.  The FBI wouldn't have hired him as a janitor.  Yet with his election, he was immediately given access to all of this nation's secrets and had his finger on the nuclear button. 


If the FBI has the right to probe the past of a person who is applying for an entry level position, we certainly have the right to probe the pasts of people who aspire to this nation's highest office.  We have a right to know who they associate with and who their friends are.  We have a right to know if they cheat on their spouse, 'cause anyone who'll lie to and cheat on the person they have sworn to love above all others will most assuredly lie to and cheat on me.  We have a right to know if they drink too much. We have a right to know what drugs they are taking and why, because I don't want someone on prozac answering the red phone at 3:00 in the morning.  We have the right to know if they kick their dog.

These people aren't running for president of the student body, nor did they just suddenly show up.  They have pasts, and what they have done in the past is the only way we have to judge how they might behave in the future.  What they're saying and doing now to get themselves elected isn't anywhere near as important as what they have said and done for the entirety of their lives.   

Think about that come November.  



 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our Frightening Future

 
Brigitte Bardot is on trial for insulting muslims, the fifth time she has faced the charge of "inciting racial hatred".
 
What did she say?  "I am fed up with being under the thumb of this population, which is destroying us, destroying our country and imposing its acts."
 
She is under the thumb of a population which is imposing its acts.  The very fact that she is being prosecuted for "inciting racial hatred" simply by expressing her opinion is proof that France's fundamental preference is to appease its muslim population. 

Hey France, listen up!  Inciting racial hatred is when you hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings, killing people just for the sheer thrill of it.  Inciting racial hatred is when you kidnap a private citizen, hog tie him, saw off his head, and release the video of your butchery to the world.  Inciting racial hatred is when you call Jews pigs and call for their annihilation.   Inciting racial hatred is when you give voice to your delusions of world domination.

Muslims wreak havoc and destruction, plot, kidnap, and slaughter with abandon, then whine like the little babies they are when someone "insults" them.  And the western world lets them get away with it.  What a bunch of sniveling cowards we have become.
 
The next time some muslim bawls about being insulted, the western world should stand up and say, So F______ What!  If you don't like it, leave.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive